Ketersediaan

Kode Eksemplar	No. Panggil	Tipe Koleksi	Lokasi	Status Eksemplar
A21001FK	A20001FK	Artikel Jurnal	Perpustakaan FKUI (DIGITAL)	Tersedia namun tidak untuk dipinjamkan - No Loan

INTRODUCTION

Bilateral microtia often presents more complex craniofacial syndromes. Operative intervention
on patients must be considered the surgery process and the function and aesthetic result.
Bilateral microtia accounts for approximately 10 % of microtia cases 1,2 In plastic
reconstructive, surgery of bilateral microtia is not unlike unilateral ear deformity . Soft tissue,
skin flap, temporal flap and framework fabrication tailored on each side which are all need
more time consuming for the surgeon and anaesthesia and increase the patient’s morbidity.
Traditional surgical approach remains to address each side independently in every operative
step . Moreover, carrying out a stage of the reconstruction on one ear in each surgical sitting
implies a protracted course of treatment, requiring a minimum of 1 ½ to 2 years to complete
the surgery in Nagata technique include atresiaplasty and hearing function. This potentially
represents an increased burden in time lost from school and sports for the child and work for
the parents.

Since the inception of autologous reconstruction for microtia by Tanzer in 1959 2 Numerous
refinements both technique and construct have been proposed and developed. Cases of
bilateral autologous reconstruction, each side is addressed independently in staged fashion,
necessitating an extended course of treatment. The efficacy of performing each stage of
bilateral microtia reconstruction in simultaneous fashion. First in Nagata technique, the
harvesting rib cartilage taken from 6-9 th rib and divided into 2 and carving for 2 ear
framework. The advantage of this technique only once incision and take rib cartilage and
doing the reconstruction of secondary rib defect.